Abstract
Characterizing the spatial variability of net flow transport in a tide-dominated area like the East China Sea (ECS) is key to understanding the material and heat budget as well as their impacts on local ecosystem. However, the residual circulation in the ECS was much less confirmed by observations as it can only be derived from very sparse mooring data. Here for the first time we obtain the spatial patterns of tidal and residual currents in the inner ECS shelf from ADCP underway measurements conducted in 12 cruises using a spatial least squares (SLS) fitting technique. The SLS method is validated with the traditional harmonic analysis using numerical simulation results and then implemented with the observational data. The tidal current is dominated by two semidiurnal components M2 and S2 in this area, with the major axis of tidal ellipse along northwest-southeast direction. The ADCP-derived tide parameters are in good agreement with those from the mooring data and barotropic tide model. The annual spatial pattern of residual circulation is characterized by a southward coastal current and a northward shelf current, which are identified as the East China Sea Coastal Current (ECSCC) from Changjiang River runoff and the Taiwan Warm Current (TWC) originated from Taiwan Strait and Kuroshio. Their magnitudes are comparable but of one order smaller than tides. The vertical structure of TWC shows a subsurface-intensified feature in line with previous mooring observations. The north limit of TWC is approximately at 31.5°N around the submerged valley, beyond which the northward TWC becomes almost invisible. By a series of virtual cruise experiments, we show that the observation data length is the most crucial factor controlling the SLS fitting accuracy, while the role of other factors like sampling frequency is secondary. With a fixed-length dataset, the degree of polynomial function used for SLS fitting must be properly determined to minimize the under-fitting and over-fitting error, and there is also a trade-off in the fitting accuracy between tidal and residual currents depending on the fitting strategy.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.