Thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty and trapeziectomy using a tenodesis screw compared to ligament reconstruction

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the results of patients treated with a thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) suspension arthroplasty using an interference screw technique with patients that were treated by trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction. A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients over 18 years old who required surgical treatment for thumb CMC joint arthritis treated by a single surgeon. Patients included in the study followed the same preoperative and postoperative protocol. Information related to functional outcomes was collected (pinch and grip strength, pain, Kapandji score, proximal migration of first metacarpal bone). One hundred and five patients were included, 77% were female, age at the time of the study was 62.7 years old; 74 (70%) patients were treated with the tenodesis screw (TS) technique and 31 (30%) with trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction (TZLR). Patients were followed for a mean of 8.4 months. Postoperative pain was 1.2 in the TS group and 0.6 in the TZLR group; Kapandji score was 8.3 in the TS group and 9 in the TZLR group; in the TS group, the grip strength was 26.2kg and key pinch strength was 6.15kg; in the TZLR group, grip strength was 12.8kg and key pinch strength was 4.7kg. Proximal migration was 0.4cm in the TZLR group and 0.6cm in the TS group. The use of tenodesis screw and half of the flexor carpi radialis had minor advantages, such as increasing the grip and key pinch strength without differences relative the non-operated thumb, minimal migration of the first metacarpal bone compared with the other technique.