Abstract
Results indicate that the two recently introduced self-adjusting heaps are the most competitive choices for the applications considered. Further, the results indicate that only some heap structures support lazymerge/lazydelete operations well, partially confirming that algorithms based on top-down skew heap compare more favorably than those based on binomial queues, that there are strong grounds for believing the conjectured amortized time bounds for pairing heap operations, and that pairing heaps are a competitive alternative to Fibonacci heaps.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
