Abstract

Abstract The binding of thiosulfate, bromide, and iodide to human methemoglobin A is examined. Visible and electron paramagnetic spectra of the substituted methemoglobins suggest that the bromide and iodide complexes are predominantly low spin, and the thiosulfate, high spin. Thiosulfate binds hyperbolically while iodide and bromide show apparent sigmoidal behavior. The binding behavior of the halide ions is not due to cooperative interaction, but rather to a protein, structural perturbation induced by neutral salts.

Highlights

  • The last two ligands appear to bind sigmoidally, but, as we discuss, these halides do not bind with cooperativity

  • Protein was equilibrated with the ligand until equilibrium was reached at 22.0 f O.l”, and the absorbance was measured with a Gary model 16 spectrophotometer

  • The binding of thiosulfate, iodide, and bromide to methemoglobin iron was determined by measuring absorbance changes in the visible region of the protein spectrum

Read more

Summary

SUMMARY

The binding of thiosulfate, bromide, and iodide to human methemoglobin A is examined. Visible and electron paramagnetic spectra of the substituted methemoglobins suggest that the bromide and iodide complexes are predominantly low spin, and the thiosulfate, high spin. Thiosulfate binds hyperbolically while iodide and bromide show apparent sigmoidal behavior. The binding behavior of the halide ions is not due to cooperative interaction, but rather to a protein, structural perturbation induced by neutral salts. (Cyanide has been reported to bind sigmoidally [1] to methemoglobin, but more recently [6] hyperbolic binding was found.) This difference in binding characteristics may be a reflection of a basic difference in the heme-protein interaction. Regardless of the lack of similarity in binding behavior, knowledge of the manner in which apoprotein interacts with the prosthetic group of methemoglobin to control the magnitude of the ligand-Fe(II1) association constant is of interest, and may be relevant to a discussion of the sigmoidal oxygenation of deoxyhemoglobin. The last two ligands appear to bind sigmoidally, but, as we discuss, these halides do not bind with cooperativity

IIf ethods
AND DJSCUSSION
IO rc b
Methemoglobin Ligand Complexes
IC ro b x
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.