Three-dimensional Structure of Nucleotide-bearing Crossbridges in Situ: Oblique Section Reconstruction of Insect Flight Muscle in AMPPNP at 23°C

Abstract

We have explored the three-dimensional structure of myosin crossbridges in situin order to define the structural changes that occur when nucleotide binds to the myosin motor. When AMPPNP binds to rigor insect flight muscle, each half sarcomere lengthens by ∼2.0 nm and tension is reduced by ∼70% without a reduction in stiffness, suggesting partial reversal of the power stroke. We have obtained averaged oblique section three-dimen sional reconstructions of mechanically monitored insect flight muscle in AMPPNP that permit simultaneous examination of all myosin crossbridges within the unit cell and direct comparison of calculated transforms with X-ray diagrams of the native fibers. Transforms calculated from the oblique section reconstruction of AMPPNP insect flight muscle at 23 °C show good agreement with native X-ray diagrams, suggesting that the average crossbridge forms in the reconstruction reflect the native structure. In contrast to the rigor lead and rear crossbridges in the double chevrons, the averaged reconstruction of AMPPNP fibers show only one crossbridge class, in the position of the rigor lead bridge. The portion of the crossbridge close to the thick filament appears broader than in rigor, and shows a small 0.5 to 1.0 nm M-ward shift of the regulatory domain region of myosin. In transverse view, AMPPNP “lead” crossbridges are less azimuthally bent than rigor. Fitting the atomic model of actomyosin subfragment 1 to the averaged crossbridges shows that the detectable differences between rigor bridges and between rigor and AMPPNP bridges occur in the alignment and angles of the regulatory domains and suggests that rear bridges are more strained than lead crossbridges. The apparent absence of rear bridges in AMPPNP in averaged reconstructions indicates detachment of a number of force-bearing bridges, which conflicts with the maintained stiffness of the fibers used for the reconstruction. This conflict may be explained if rigor rear bridges become distributed irregularly over more actin sites in AMPPNP, so that their average density is too low to appear in the averaged reconstructions. The reconstructions indicate that in insect flight muscle the response of in siturigor crossbridges to AMPPNP binding is not uniform. Lead bridges persist but have altered structure in the light chain domain, whereas rear bridges detach and possibly redistribute. Shape changes in attached myosin heads within the myofibrillar lattice are in the appropriate direction and of the appropriate magnitude needed to explain the sarcomere lengthening. This could be a direct response to nucleotide binding, a passive response to rear bridge detachment, or a combination of both.