Abstract

The rail is subjected to cyclic stress and plastic deformation, excessive accumulation of which can promote rail degradation. A finite element (FE) model of three-dimensional (3D) cyclic rolling contact (CRC) with the implementation of an improved cyclic plasticity constitutive material model is developed to analyze the 3D elastic–plastic stress. Comparisons of the FE simulation results of 2D repeated moving pressure (RMP), 3D RMP, and 3D CRC models are conducted to elucidate the differences. The evolution and distribution patterns of the elastic–plastic mechanical behavior of wheel–rail contact with the number of cycles are also investigated. The FE results show that the 2D RMP model is conservative in predictions, and the results derived from the 3D RMP and 3D CRC models are comparable, while opposite results are available for some essential components. The 3D CRC model is a necessary choice especially for fatigue life prediction study. Due to the partial slip and cyclic rolling, the stresses and strains near the rail surface layer are significant and continuously accumulate. The residual equivalent plastic strain and the ratchetting strain increase with the increase of the tangential traction and the axle load, which will accelerate rail damage.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call