Abstract

To investigate variability in the level of bifurcation relative to other anatomical landmarks on computed tomography (CT) and to develop an objective and reproducible technique for identifying patients with a high carotid bifurcation who might therefore be at greater risk of operative complications. This was a retrospective cross-sectional, imaging study. A series of 86 nonselected consecutive CT carotid angiograms (172 arteries) were analysed. Using three-dimensional reconstructive software, the curved length (CL) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the straight-line distance (SLD) from the bifurcation to the base of skull was measured for 140 carotid arteries. The tortuosity index (TI) of each ICA was calculated by dividing CL by SLD. The relationship of the bifurcation to eight anatomical landmarks in the neck was assessed in order to identify a landmark that could act as a surrogate marker of high carotid bifurcation. The landmarks examined were the angle of mandible, greater horn of hyoid, body of hyoid, upper margin of thyroid cartilage, cervical vertebrae, mastoid process, sternoclavicular joint, and sternal notch. The median curved length of the ICA was 80.4mm (range 58.0-129.0mm). The median distance of bifurcation from the base of the skull was 72.7mm (range 58.1-98.1mm). There was excellent interobserver agreement in measuring SLD, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.993 (p=.00). The median tortuosity index was 1.12 (range 1.01-1.64). Distance from the mastoid process had the greatest correlation with high bifurcation; Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.894 (two-tailed p=.00). Bifurcations within 5cm of the mastoid process are likely to be in the highest quartile (82.9% sensitive, 80.1% specific). Measuring the distance of carotid bifurcation from the base of the skull (SLD), a measure previously not well defined, may be useful in predicting difficult neck dissection and endarterectomy. A distance from mastoid of ≤ 5cm may also alert the surgeon to potential difficulties.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.