Anatomical Suitability of Iliac Branch Devices for East Asian Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

This study aimed to identify the iliac artery characteristics of East Asian patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and to evaluate anatomical suitability rates with current iliac branch devices (IBDs). This was a single centre, retrospective, cross sectional study. Patients diagnosed with AAA between 2008 and 2023 were enrolled. The morphological parameters of the iliac arteries were measured, and their eligibility for four IBDs (Cook ZBIS, Gore IBE, E-Liac IBD, and G-Iliac IBD) was evaluated according to the manufacturer's latest instructions for use (IFU). Among 1 144 AAAs observed in the study, 45.5% (n= 521) presented with concurrent common iliac artery aneurysm (CIAA). In total, 304 patients (26.6%) and 371 iliac arteries necessitated internal iliac artery (IIA) reconstruction. The anatomical suitability rates for the Cook ZBIS, Gore IBE, E-Liac IBD, and G-Iliac IBD were 18.9%, 21.8%, 11.9%, and 22.6%, respectively. The E-Liac IBD exhibited a significantly lower anatomical suitability rate compared with the other three devices (p < .001). The primary IBD exclusion criteria were: a common iliac artery (CIA) length of < 50 mm for Cook ZBIS (n= 211, 56.9%); an IIA diameter of < 6.5 mm or > 13.5 mm for Gore IBE (n= 177, 47.7%); and a CIA bifurcation diameter of < 18 mm both for E-Liac IBD and G-Iliac IBD (n= 244, 65.8%). A total of 198 patients (53.4%) failed to meet the anatomical criteria for any device, while 112 (30.2%) qualified for just one device, 26 (7.0%) for two devices, 25 (6.7%) for three devices, and 10 (2.7%) for all four devices. A significant proportion of East Asian patients with AAA present with concurrent CIAA, necessitating substantial IIA reconstruction. IBD techniques show low anatomical suitability rates among the East Asian population, with 53.4% of patients failing to meet anatomical criteria for any IBD based on the manufacturer's IFU.