Abstract

The notion of “mixtures” has become pervasive in behavioral and cognitive sciences, due to the success of dual-process theories of cognition. However, providing support for such dual-process theories is not trivial, as it crucially requires properties in the data that are specific to mixture of cognitive processes. In theory, one such property could be the fixed-point property of binary mixture data, applied–for instance- to response times. In that case, the fixed-point property entails that response time distributions obtained in an experiment in which the mixture proportion is manipulated would have a common density point. In the current article, we discuss the application of the fixed-point property and identify three boundary conditions under which the fixed-point property will not be interpretable. In Boundary condition 1, a finding in support of the fixed-point will be mute because of a lack of difference between conditions. Boundary condition 2 refers to the case in which the extreme conditions are so different that a mixture may display bimodality. In this case, a mixture hypothesis is clearly supported, yet the fixed-point may not be found. In Boundary condition 3 the fixed-point may also not be present, yet a mixture might still exist but is occluded due to additional changes in behavior. Finding the fixed-property provides strong support for a dual-process account, yet the boundary conditions that we identify should be considered before making inferences about underlying psychological processes.

Highlights

  • The notion of “mixtures” has become pervasive in behavioral and cognitive sciences

  • We provide a cautionary note to the application of the above-sketched analysis by identifying three boundary conditions under which the fixed-point property will not be interpretable

  • In the example of a speed accuracy trade-off introduced earlier, the fixed-point test would correctly identify a mixture of strategies, only in the case where there is a pure modification of the mixture proportion between a fast-guess and a slow-decision strategy–e.g. the proportion of fast guesses is increased in response to a time-pressure manipulation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The notion of “mixtures” has become pervasive in behavioral and cognitive sciences. From psychology to economics or reinforcement learning theories, behavior and decisions are conceptualized as the joint outputs (mixture) of multiple cognitive modules. If the experimental manipulation affects some aspect of the data in addition to the mixture proportion the fixed-point property may not apply.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call