Abstract
Here we offer an accounting of the exchange that has occurred across the pages of this journal over the course of the last two years in Glanzer (2022); Small et al. (2022); Glanzer and Martin (2023); Edwards et al. (2023) and Glanzer (2024). As we don’t see there being any satisfactory conclusion–to the parties engaged and the discourses and communities of scholars we might assume they represent–coming from our jumping into the fray. We choose to instead avail ourselves of the queer practice of arguing to the side of things (Burke & Greteman, 2022).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have