Abstract
By contrast with Eastern Canada, it took a long time for mechanized systems to transform woods work in the American Southeast. The Southeast experienced a more episodic, delayed and less complex transformation of woods work, one marked by ‘making do”, incremental innovations, simpler systems, a reliance on the adaptation of ideas and machines developed elsewhere, and the tendency for a single harvesting system to dominate use over long periods of time. We argue the social, economic and environmental conditions of the Southeast after 1945 facilitated a laissez-faire attitude to pre-industrial harvesting methods by pulp and paper mill owners. The most important of these conditions was that alternative employment for rural African-Americans was slow to develop, leaving a large source of cheap, available labour for woods work. Pulp mill owners were able to outsource the provision of wood to small contractors through a network of local intermediaries called “wood dealers”. The wood supply system created by pulp mill owners placed the costs of innovation into the hands of the poorly capitalized harvesting contractors. This wood supply system delivered mill owners wood at very low prices, but it effectively inhibited steady and thoroughgoing innovation for many years.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.