Abstract
AbstractOn the basis of experimental structural data ten system components were considered in the ZnO‐Nb2O5‐P2O5 thermodynamic model of Shakhmatkin and Vedishcheva – ZnO, Nb2O5, P2O5, ZnP4O11, Zn(PO3)2, Zn2P2O7, Zn3(PO4)2, NbO(PO3)3, (NbO)4(P2O7)3, and NbOPO4. The molar Gibbs energies of ZnO, Nb2O5, P2O5, and Zn3(PO4)2 were taken from the FACT database. The unknown Gibbs energies of the other components were estimated by minimizing the sum of squares of deviations between the calculated and measured equilibrium molar amounts of system components for the series xNb2O5·50ZnO·(50‐x)P2O5. The model was validated by the Multivariate Curve Resolution (MCR) and Malfait's analysis of Raman spectra of xNb2O5·(50‐x)ZnO·50P2O5 glasses. The MCR analysis performed for three components resulted in loadings that were in acceptable coincidence with partial Raman spectra obtained by Malfait's decomposition. Both the MCR and the Malfait's decomposition reproduced the experimental Raman spectra very well ‐ on the level of experimental error.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
