Abstract

Differential thermal analysis and thermogravimetric analysis of copper(II) and nickel(II) complexes of [4,4′-(l-ethyl-2-methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)dinitrilo]bis(1,1,1-trifluoro-2-pentanone) [bis(trifluoroacetyl-acetone)ethylmethylethylenediiminel(H 2F 3A 2EMen) and [4,4′-(l-ethyl-2-methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)dinitrilo]-bis(1,1,1-trifluoro-6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one) [bis(ti-ifluoroacetylmesityl oxide)ethylmethylethylenediimine] (H 2F 3AM 2EMen) and copper(II), nickel(II) and oxovanadium(IV) complexes of [4,4′-(1-ethyl-2-methyl-1,2-ethanediyl)dinitrilo]bis(2-pentanone) [bis(acetylacetone)ethylmethylethylenediimine] (H 2A 2EMen) were carried out and losses in weight between 78 and 100% occurred at temperatures up to 300°C. The copper, nickel and oxovanadium complexes of H 2A 2EMen are adequately separated by gas chromatographic (GC) columns, but the copper and nickel complexes of H 2F 3A 2EMen and H 2F 3AM 2EMen could not be resolved. The copper and nickel complexes of H 2F 3A 2EMen and H 2F 3AM 2EMen and the copper, nickel and oxovanadium complexes of H 2A 2EMen were separated on normal- and reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) columns. The elution of copper and nickel complexes on GC and HPLC columns was compared in order to evaluate the effects of substituents on elution.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.