Abstract
Zircon–Mullite (ZrSiO4–3Al2O3·2SiO2) composites are refractory materials widely employed in many industries. Thermal shock behaviour of these materials must be considered because it is sometimes its failure mechanism.In this work both thermal shock resistance (TSR) and fatigue (TFR) of Zircon–Mullite composites with different compositions and microstructure configurations were experimentally evaluated by a non destructive measurement of the elastic modulus (E) and compared with the prediction made from the theoretical parameters (R, R‴ and RST).A typical solid brittle material behaviour was found; a simple mathematical expression facilitated the TFR analysis. Although the microstructural configurations studied differed, the experimental behaviour of this group of materials was almost equal. This fact was satisfactorily predicted by the theoretical parameters (R and R‴) showing the importance and potential of the evaluation mechanical evaluation of the ceramic material that define these two parameters. On the other hand the slight difference evaluated in the TFR was correlated with the only parameter that takes into account the fracture toughness (RST) showing that the significance of this property in a more deep characterization of the ceramic materials.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.