Abstract
The paper discusses alternative methods to assess thermal shock in refractories. Thermal shock performance of two conventional silica bricks and two novice fused silica materials has been studied. Methods involving fracture mechanical tests of monotonic loading, repetitive thermal shock tests and cyclic strain controlled fatigue tests have been utilised. The amorphous fused silica is rather brittle. However low thermal expansion guarantees its superior thermal shock resistance. In-service crystallisation is to happen rather quickly. For crystallised fused silica of the studied morphology the tests coherently predict superior thermal shock resistance due to less brittle failure. Strain controlled fatigue test allows assessment of strain limits in the conditions of cyclic loading and thus combines the benefits of the thermal shock and monotonic fracture mechanics tests. Strain tolerance seems to be the property to correlate the results of the alternative test methods and those with the service loads.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.