Theoretical Loss and Gambling Intensity: A Simulation Study

Abstract

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 16, No. 5 ArticlesTheoretical Loss and Gambling Intensity: A Simulation StudyMichael Auer, Andreas Schneeberger, and Mark D. GriffithsMichael AuerSearch for more papers by this author, Andreas SchneebergerSearch for more papers by this author, and Mark D. GriffithsSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:17 May 2012https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2012.1655AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byPlayers Gonna Pay: Characterizing gamblers and gambling-related harm with payments transaction dataComputers in Human Behavior, Vol. 143The relationship between structural characteristics and gambling behaviour: An online gambling player tracking study13 May 2022 | Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1The Impact of Personalized Feedback Interventions by a Gambling Operator on Subsequent Gambling Expenditure in a Sample of Dutch Online Gamblers9 November 2022 | Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 113Analyzing Consumer Protection for Gamblers Across Different Online Gambling Operators: A Replication Study9 November 2021 | International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Vol. 16Reaching Out to Big Losers: How Different Types of Gamblers are Affected by a Brief Motivational Contact Initiated by the Gambling Provider21 September 2020 | Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 37, No. 2Understanding Online Voluntary Self-Exclusion in Gambling: An Empirical Study Using Account-Based Behavioral Tracking Data19 February 2021 | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 18, No. 4Gambling Self-Control Strategies: A Qualitative Analysis12 January 2021 | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 18, No. 2The use of personalized messages on wagering behavior of Swedish online gamblers: An empirical studyComputers in Human Behavior, Vol. 110The Cambridge Handbook of Substance and Behavioral Addictions13 July 2020 | , Vol. 84Ongoing and Future Research DirectionsFeedback Models for Gambling Control: The Use and Efficacy of Online Responsible Gambling ToolsReaching out to big losers leads to sustained reductions in gambling over 1 year: a randomized controlled trial of brief motivational contact13 February 2020 | Addiction, Vol. 115, No. 8Early intervention and identification of gambling disorder: a systematic literature review of strategies implemented by gambling operatorsCentral European Journal of Public Health, Vol. 28, No. 1The Effects of Voluntary Deposit Limit-Setting on Long-Term Online Gambling Expenditure Michael Auer, Niklas Hopfgartner, and Mark D. Griffiths5 February 2020 | Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, Vol. 23, No. 2Jeux de hasard et d’argent en ligne : quelles spécificités en matière de réduction des risques ?Pratiques Psychologiques, Vol. 25, No. 1Cognitive Dissonance, Personalized Feedback, and Online Gambling Behavior: An Exploratory Study Using Objective Tracking Data and Subjective Self-Report20 September 2017 | International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Vol. 16, No. 3A Critical Review of the Harm-Minimisation Tools Available for Electronic Gambling11 June 2016 | Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 33, No. 1Personalized Behavioral Feedback for Online Gamblers: A Real World Empirical Study28 November 2016 | Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7Devil in the Details: A Critical Review of “Theoretical Loss”15 December 2015 | Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 32, No. 3The use of personalized behavioral feedback for online gamblers: an empirical study23 September 2015 | Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6Theoretical Loss and Gambling Intensity (Revisited): A Response to Braverman et al. (2013)24 April 2014 | Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 31, No. 3Tilting at Windmills: A Comment on Auer and Griffiths5 December 2013 | Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 31, No. 2Research funding in gambling studies: some further observations16 March 2015 | International Gambling Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1An Empirical Investigation of Theoretical Loss and Gambling Intensity19 March 2013 | Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 30, No. 4Voluntary Limit Setting and Player Choice in Most Intense Online Gamblers: An Empirical Study of Gambling Behaviour5 September 2012 | Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 29, No. 4 Volume 16Issue 5May 2012 InformationCopyright 2012, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Michael Auer, Andreas Schneeberger, and Mark D. Griffiths.Theoretical Loss and Gambling Intensity: A Simulation Study.Gaming Law Review and Economics.May 2012.269-273.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2012.1655Published in Volume: 16 Issue 5: May 17, 2012PDF download