Abstract

The in situ non-destructive quantitative observation of plant roots is difficult. Traditional detection methods are not only time-consuming and labor-intensive, but also destroy the root environment. Ground penetrating radar (GPR), as a non-destructive detection method, has great potential in the estimation of root parameters. In this paper, we use GprMax software to perform forward modeling of plant roots under different soil dielectric constants, and analyze the situation of plant roots with different dielectric constants and different root diameters under 1.5 GHz frequency antenna detection. Firstly, root systems with increasing diameter under different values of root and soil dielectric constant were scanned. Secondly, from the scanning results, two time points T1 and T2 of radar wave entering and penetrating the root system were defined, and the correlation between root diameter D and time interval ΔT between T1 and T2 was analyzed. Finally, the least square regression model and back propagation (BP) neural network model for root diameter parameter estimation were established, and the estimation effects of the two models were compared and evaluated. The research results show that the root diameter (12–48 mm) is highly correlated with the time interval. Given the dielectric constants of the root and soil, the prediction results of the two models are accurate, but the prediction result of the neural network model is more stable, and the residual between the predicted value and the actual value is mainly concentrated in the [−1.5 mm, 1.5 mm] range, as well as the average of prediction error percentage being 3.62%. When the dielectric constants of the root and soil are unknown, the accuracy of the prediction results of the two models is decreased, but the stability of the neural network model is still superior to the least squares model, and the residual error is mainly concentrated in the range of [−5.3 mm, 5.0 mm], the average of prediction error percentage is 10.19%. This study uses GprMax to simulate root system detection and reveals the theoretical potential of GPR technology for non-destructive estimation of root diameter parameters. It is also pointed out that in the field exploration process, if the dielectric constants of the root and soil in the experimental site are sampled and measured first, the prediction accuracy of the model for root diameter would be effectively improved. This research is based on simulation experiments, so further simulation followed by laboratory and field testing is warranted using non-uniform roots and soil.

Highlights

  • Plant roots are important media to ensure the carbon-nitrogen-water cycle of terrestrial ecosystems [1]

  • The trained neural network model was used to predict the root diameter parameters under the condition of unknown root and soil dielectric constants, and the results showed that the prediction performance was more stable than the least square model

  • We describe two root diameter parameter prediction models based on simulation data, namely least square model and neural network model, and compare the prediction performance of the two models under the condition of known and unknown relative dielectric constants of root and soil

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plant roots are important media to ensure the carbon-nitrogen-water cycle of terrestrial ecosystems [1]. With the innovation and development of technology, some in situ non-destructive observation methods have become the hotspots of plant root parameter estimation and distribution modeling research [9], such as minirhizotrons [10], X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) [11], magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [12], ground-penetrating radar (GPR) method [13,14,15,16], etc. GPR is a non-intrusive geophysical technology that uses high-frequency electromagnetic waves to locate underground targets [17]. It has fast detection speed, simple and flexible operation, and is widely used in the field of non-destructive detection [18]. Zhang et al, and Wu et al have illustrated a more detailed introduction to the working methods of GPR [20,21,22]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call