Theoretical and experimental investigations of crack propagation behavior and delamination in GLARE specimens affected by non-proportional fatigue loadings

Abstract

In actual operation conditions, the structural parts of automotive, aerospace and other significant industrial applications undergo the multi axial fatigue loading with non-proportionality states. Fiber metal laminates (known as FML) are the best options to manufacture these structural parts. The current study examines the effects of a specific condition of multi-axial fatigue loadings (repeated tension with static shear stresses) on the behaviors of crack growth and delamination in GLARE specimens (abbreviated of glass laminates aluminum reinforced epoxy). Analytical model with idea of maximum tangential stress criterion modification has been adopted to represent the non-proportionality state of fatigue loading. Paris equation, equivalent stress intensity factor range, fiber-bridging effects and delamination shape were included in this model. The current idea was compared with a previous idea that depends on the principal stresses in representation of non-proportional multi-axial fatigue loadings. Specimens have coding GLARE_2A 2/1 were fabricated by VARTM technique (vacuum assisted resin transfer molding technique). Special treatments have been done on the aluminum surfaces before specimen fabrication to increasing delamination resistance. Novel fatigue apparatus was manufactured to guarantee apply the under study conditions for multi axial fatigue loading and to introduce experimental investigation of crack and delamination growths in GLARE specimens. The obtained results of the current idea were in a considerable agreement with that of the previous idea of the principal stresses. The maximum deviations between analytically extracted results were less than 1% for crack growth, 5.4% for bridging stress, 4.8% for crack opening and 6.3% for delamination growth. Experimentally, the measured results have been compared with analytical results for the purpose of validation. Acceptable matching between results with maximum difference of 7.65% was the important outcome of this study.