Abstract

The process of domestication increases the variety of phenotypes expressed in animals. Zooarchaeologists have attempted to study these changes osteologically in their search for the geographic and temporal origins of initial animal domestication during the late Pleistocene and early Holocene. Traditional biometric approaches have explored broad changes in body size over time, but this approach provides poor resolution. Here we investigate whether geometric morphometric (GMM) analyses of cranial shape can be used to provide better resolution between wild and domestic pigs (Sus scrofa), since shape is less affected by environmental factors than size. GMM combined with traditional multivariate statistics were applied to the crania of 42 modern domestic pigs (representing 6 breeds), 10 wild × domestic first generation hybrid pigs and 55 adult wild boar. Further analyses were carried out on morphologically discrete portions of the crania to simulate the fragmented nature of archaeological mammal remains. We found highly significant discrimination between wild and domestic pigs, both on the whole crania, and subsets including the parietal, the basicranium, the angle of the nasal and the zygomatic. We also demonstrate that it is possible to discriminate different domestic breeds on the basis of cranial morphology, and that 1st generation hybrid wild × domestic pig morphology more closely resembles wild pigs than domestic, suggesting that a wild phenotype (here represented by morphology) is dominant over a recessive domestic one. Our data demonstrate that GMM techniques can provide a quantifiable, clear classification between wild and domestic Sus (even using partial cranial remains) which has significant implications for zooarchaeological research.

Highlights

  • A key part in the transition of human subsistence strategies from hunting and foraging to farming was the domestication of plants and animals during the early Neolithic

  • To test for the presence of allometries, a multivariate regression of cranial shape against log centroid size on pooled within-group variation was conducted on the wild and domestic samples using Morphoj, both for the complete sample and for the main individual principle components

  • Our results show that these morphological differences have very good discrimination power, demonstrating that wild and domestic pigs can be identified with a considerable degree of confidence on the basis of cranial morphology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A key part in the transition of human subsistence strategies from hunting and foraging to farming was the domestication of plants and animals during the early Neolithic. Studies of this transition includes locating and analysing the origins of animal domestication (Rowley-Conwy et al, 2012), which requires the ability to reliably identify between the wild and domestic remains of the same species. The traditional methodology of wild-domestic assignment in the archaeozoological record is largely based on size reduction of either dental or skeletal elements in early domesticated animals

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call