Abstract

Proteins containing ubiquitin-like (UBL) and ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domains interact with various binding partners and function as hubs during ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation. A common interaction of the budding yeast UBL-UBA proteins Rad23 and Dsk2 with the E4 ubiquitin ligase Ufd2 has been described in endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation among other pathways. The UBL domains of Rad23 and Dsk2 play a prominent role in this process by interacting with Ufd2 and different subunits of the 26 S proteasome. Here, we report crystal structures of Ufd2 in complex with the UBL domains of Rad23 and Dsk2. The N-terminal UBL-interacting region of Ufd2 exhibits a unique sequence pattern, which is distinct from any known ubiquitin- or UBL-binding domain identified so far. Residue-specific differences exist in the interactions of these UBL domains with Ufd2, which are coupled to subtle differences in their binding affinities. The molecular details of their differential interactions point to a role for adaptive evolution in shaping these interfaces.

Highlights

  • The ubiquitin proteasome system regulates diverse cellular processes including cell cycle progression, immune response, neurodegenerative diseases, and protein quality control [1,2,3,4]

  • UBL-binding Domain of Ufd2 cific differences exist in the interactions of the UBL domains of Rad23 and Dsk2 with Ufd2, which are coupled to subtle differences in their overall binding affinities

  • Members of different classes of UBL-binding domains (UBD) such as UBA or UBL domains result from these processes

Read more

Summary

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

UBL-binding Domain of Ufd cific differences exist in the interactions of the UBL domains of Rad and Dsk with Ufd, which are coupled to subtle differences in their overall binding affinities. Mutational analyses of the binding surface of the UBL domains and a closer inspection of the thermodynamic contributions of those residues point to adaptive evolution as a factor shaping these interfaces

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
No of reflections
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call