Abstract
Those who study village origins have historically concentrated on two facets of the phenomenon. First, considerable effort has been made to establish the date of their appearance in the landscape, a task which has largely been achieved. Secondly, and informed by the first, they have sought to identify the underlying causes that might account for nucleation, a question that has defied full resolution. Here it is suggested that this lack of resolution may stem in part from the incorrect framing of the question which itself is based on the assumption that because we can see the effect there must be a recognisable cause. Through analogy and borrowing from the first principles of chaos and complexity theory, it is argued here that villages might just as easily form from a series of small-scale actions or events that are unlikely to leave a visible signature in the historical and archaeological record and which, when enacted or experienced, were never conceived as a stage in a conscious project of nucleation. It is suggested, furthermore, that the uneven distribution of villages across England might in part be explained by the relative stability or instability of the landscapes in which they formed, the latter providing a context in which small-scale events might carry greater potential to effect greater structural change. The inability to prove or disprove this possibility leaves the study of village origins as currently conceived with nowhere to go. However, rather than abandoning the enquiry, it is suggested that the subject needs to shift its emphasis from settlement form to the people who made up the first village communities.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call