The value of patient registries in advancing pediatric surgical care.

Abstract

Pediatric surgeons treat a variety of conditions that are distinguished by their low occurrence rate, complexity, and need for integrated multidisciplinary care. Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for generating evidence to inform best practice, they are poorly suited to rare diseases based on the variability of illness severity, unpredictability in clinical course, and the impact limitations of studying a single intervention at a time. An alternative to RCTs for comparative effectiveness research for rare diseases in pediatric surgery is the patient registry, which collects detailed and condition-specific patient level data related to illness severity, treatment, and outcome, and allows a large, disease-specific database to be created for the dual purposes of collaborative research and quality improvement across participating sites. This review discusses the various functions of a patient registry in fulfilling its mandate of evidence-based practice and outcome improvement using examples from a variety of existing pediatric surgical registries. The value proposition of patient registries as sources of knowledge, facilitators of practice standardization, and enablers of continuous quality improvement is discussed.