Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Thoracoscopic and Open Repair For Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula

Abstract

BackgroundThe aim was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes for thoracoscopic repair of EA/TEF and compare with open repair. MethodsPatients who underwent EA/TEF repair during 2000–2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with delayed repair were excluded. Demographic, operative, outcome data was collected. Outcomes were compared using Wilcoxon-rank sum tests for continuous, Chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests for categorical data. ResultsThere were 104 patients with primary repair, 49 (47.1%) underwent thoracoscopic repair per surgeon's choice. Type C accounted for 101 (97.1%) of the cases. Gestational age and birth weight were higher in the thoracoscopy group (p = 0.001). The rate of ≥3 VACTERL anomalies was higher in the OR group (p = 0.016). Operative time, rate of anastomotic leak, time to first oral feeding were similar (p > 0.05). Thoracoscopy group had decreased length of ventilation (p = 0.026) and length of stay (p = 0.029). The incidence of anastomotic stricture was higher in the thoracoscopy group (p = 0.012). Recurrent TEF was one case in each group. Rates of tube feeding at discharge and in first year were similar (p > 0.05), rate in third year was decreased (p = 0.032) in the thoracoscopy group. Rates of anti-reflux medication in first and third years, and fundoplication rate were similar (p > 0.05). ConclusionsMany of the short- and long-term outcomes are comparable between thoracoscopic and open repair of EA/TEF. Length of ventilation, length of stay are decreased in the thoracoscopy group. Anastomotic stricture is higher, the need for long-term tube feeding is lower after thoracoscopic repair. Although these results could be affected by selection bias, they are still promising for advancing thoracoscopic repair of EA/TEF safely and efficiently. Level of EvidenceLevel III.