THE VALIDITY OF THE STUDY OF OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES (SOF) INDEX FOR ASSESSING COMMUNITY-BASED OLDER ADULTS IN TAIWAN

Abstract

Taiwan’s Ten-Year Long-Term Care Project (TLTCP) version 2.0 has expanded to include frail adults in late 2017; however, tools for measuring frailty remain controversial. On the one hand, it has become common to use Fried’s Frailty Phenotype index to measure older adults’ frailty in Taiwan and advanced countries. On the other hand, the Taiwanese government uses the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures index (SOF index) to assess the degree of frailty and whether to receive publicly-funded exercise programs. This study aimed at assessing properties of tools of the SOF index and Fried’s Frailty Phenotype index among general, community-dwelling older adults in Taiwan. In this cross-sectional survey study, purposive sampling was employed to collect data, with 471 older adults. The participants were older than 65 years and lived in Taipei City. To analyze the data, Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient was employed to understand the association between frailty as measured by the two indexes and area under the curve (AUC) statistics was used to test the respective models by measuring the predictive validity from the two indexes. Study findings showed a moderate association between Fried’s Frailty Phenotype index and the SOF index (p<0.001). However, these two frailty indexes were inconsistent in their ability to predict validity. The result of AUC showed that while the SOF predicted falls better (p <0.001), Fried’s Frailty Phenotype index predicted disability better (p <0.001). Similar to the results from advanced countries, SOF index is a valid tool to evaluate frailty, especially for general, community-dwelling older adults in Taiwan.