Abstract

An integrated approach to the study of the structural patterns and seismic attributes was carried out on the Z-field using a 3D seismic data covering approximately 56 Km2 of western belt of the Niger Delta, checkshot data for well to seismic tie and log information for six wells from the field. This study aimed at investigating the available prospects, the responses of the basic seismic attributes to structural and stratigraphic elements within the study area. In all, six hydrocarbon bearing levels were delineated from well logs and correlated across the field. These horizons were analysed and petrophysical parameters estimated. An integration of well and seismic data was done by applying a time-depth relationship to identify where the hydrocarbon bearing sands from well posts on the seismic lines. These studies revealed two major regional growth faults (F1 and F5) dipping in the NE-SW directions and crestal faults (F4) dipping in the northern direction. The north dipping crestal fault F4 is responsible for holding the hydrocarbon in the proven closure A. The northernmost regional growth fault F1 is responsible for trapping the hydrocarbon in the prospect closure B in the north eastern part of the field. The closure C prospect is a four way dip closure to the spill point but becomes fault assisted on regional growth faults F1 and F5 at deeper levels. The trapping mechanism identified from our interpretation indicates that the field is characterized mostly by fault assisted closures and a few four way closures. The fault zones are identified by distinct displacement of walls and amplitude distortions towards the fault zones identified on the seismic sections and the extracted amplitude maps. At the south-western part of the field, using only seismic Stratigraphic approach, a part of fault F5 was too subtle to be identified, and this may lead to missing out on the potentials of the identified closure C prospect. Thus, where conventional seismic interpretation has failed, seismic attribute analysis complements.

Highlights

  • Conventional seismic stratigraphic interpretation of data has been the popular way of interpreting seismic data for the purpose of mapping geological structures, subsurface stratigraphy and reservoir architecture

  • The fault zones are identified by distinct displacement of walls and amplitude distortions towards the fault zones identified on the seismic sections and the extracted amplitude maps

  • The introduction of the 3D seismic revolution has made the use of amplitudes an integral part of seismic interpretation and has allowed more valuable geological information to be discerned as seismic attributes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Conventional seismic stratigraphic interpretation of data has been the popular way of interpreting seismic data for the purpose of mapping geological structures, subsurface stratigraphy and reservoir architecture. Though the seismically resolvable faults may be interpreted using traditional diagnostic criteria (e.g. abrupt reflector cut off, kinks etc), but the subtle faults which are often of geological or exploration significance are usually not visibly imaged by the conventional seismic sections and time slices displays. This is because they have smaller throws relative to the resolution limit of the seismic survey, which is a factor dependent on the frequency content, signal www.ccsenet.org/esr

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call