Abstract
Purpose: To compare the efficacy of laser therapy versus conventional treatment (stretching exercises and silicone heel cups) for the short-term management of CPHP. Methods: A case-control study was carried including 18 participants with 26 symptomatic limbs with CPHP. Each participant received one of two treatments; laser therapy or conventional treatment Progress was monitored using two pain scales; VAS pain scale and the Foot Function Index where participants were asked to rate their pain at the start of the study (Time 0) and after 3 weeks (Time 1). Results: Both treatment options showed a significant reduction in pain scores (p<0.05) however, when comparing both treatment options, a significant difference (p<0.05) in mean pain score was found with the laser therapy being more effective treatment option for the short-term management of CPHP. Conclusion: Laser therapy, when compared to conventional treatment, is a better short-term treatment option for the management of CPHP. Further research in this area is warranted to ensure best patient care, to further clarify long-term efficacy and optimal treatment parameters of Laser Therapy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Advance Research in Dermatology & Cosmetics (ARDC)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.