Abstract
Study ObjectiveTo compare the effects of anesthesia maintenance drugs (inhaled sevoflurane versus intravenous propofol) used in general anesthesia on the absorption of glycine 1.5% solution during hysteroscopy. DesignProspective comparative study. SettingTertiary care university hospital. PatientsOne hundred fifteen women undergoing hysteroscopy. InterventionsWomen were assigned to receive general anesthesia with inhaled sevoflurane (n = 77) or intravenous propofol (n = 38) to maintain anesthesia. MeasurementsThe primary endpoint was clinically relevant glycine 1.5% absorption (>1000 mL), while secondary endpoints were the median of glycine absorption, operative time, complications and the incidence of discontinuation of the hysteroscopic procedure due to excessive glycine 1.5% absorption. Main ResultsMaintenance with sevoflurane produced significantly increased absorption of glycine 1.5% solution compared to intravenous anesthesia (264 vs 202 mL, P = .007). Clinically relevant absorption rates (>1000 mL) were observed in the sevoflurane group (P = .04) while none of the women receiving intravenous anesthesia reached this absorption level. No cases of severe post-operative hyponatremia (Na1+<125 mmol/L) or adverse events derived from glycine 1.5% absorption were reported. No major complications (such as perforations, severe hemorrhage or infection) were presented during the interventions. ConclusionsThe results of the present study show that the use of inhaled sevoflurane is associated with significantly increased glycine 1.5% absorption compared to intravenous propofol for the maintenance of anesthesia. However, further randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the possible mechanisms and risk factors involved in the higher absorption induced by sevoflurane.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have