Abstract
Grassland vegetation can provide visual cover for terrestrial vertebrates. The most commonly used method to assess visual cover is the Robel pole. We test the use of digital photography as a more accurate and repeatable method. We assessed the digital photography method on four forage grassland species ( Pseudoroegneria spicata, Festuca campestris, Poa pratensis, Achnatherum richardsonii). Digital photos of 2-dimensional cutout silhouettes of three bird species sharp-tailed grouse, western meadowlark and savannah sparrow were used to model the impact of clipping (i.e., grazing) on visual cover. In addition, photos of artificial voles were used to model litter on cover available to small mammals. Nine sites were sampled and data were analyzed by the dominant grass species in each study plot. Regression analysis showed that digital photos ( r 2 = 0.62) were a better predictor than the Robel pole ( r 2 = 0.26) for assessment of cover. Clipping heights showed that clipping at less than 15 cm left the silhouettes 50% exposed. Digital photo analysis revealed that visual cover was affected by the type of grass species, with F. campestris > P. pratensis > A. richardsonii > P. spicata. Biomass and litter were both positively related to cover for small mammals.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
