Abstract

The forensic evaluation of clinical cranial computed tomographies (CCT) frequently is the only reliable source of morphological evidence in head injuries when the injured individual survives or when death is delayed and autopsy findings are characterized by secondary changes. We have reviewed 21 cases where clinical CCT examinations were used to establish a medico-legal diagnosis. In 18 cases falls ( n=13) could be distinguished from blows ( n=5) due to the presence and/or absence of coup and contrecoup lesions and linear or depressed skull fractures. In two cases the striking object could be identified by digital superimposition. The minimum number of blows could be determined in 1 case. Only in 3 remaining cases the results were inconclusive. In our experience, CCT scans provide an important source of information for the forensic expert. To have unbiased access to these information, it is useful to evaluate the CT scans personally which requires a basic knowledge of traumatic changes found on radiographs.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.