Abstract
In recent years, several studies have evaluated the potential of renewable energy sources in response to climate change and high energy demand. Due to its equatorial location and significant solar and wind potential, Brazil has incorporated alternative sources into its energy matrix, driven by more efficient and economical technologies for solar energy. However, the availability of observed data is still limited, and many studies rely on satellite estimates or extrapolations of in situ observations from other regions, compromising the efficiency of new technologies. This study uses NASA MERRA-2 reanalysis data to evaluate the influence of aerosols and cloudiness on the estimate of solar irradiance in Brazil. INMET stations were chosen in regions representative of the Brazilian climate and geography, with more than 12 years of observational data. MERRA-2 includes aerosol fields that interact with the model’s radiation fields, with a spatial resolution of 0.5° and hourly temporal resolution. Variables used include shortwave radiation fluxes and aerosol optical depth. Statistical indices used in performance analysis include mean bias, mean squared error, and Pearson correlation coefficient. The stations’ diurnal solar irradiance cycles were compared with MERRA-2 reanalysis data, considering different scenarios of aerosol and cloudiness effects. The reanalysis data represented the Bauru and Santa Maria stations well, while others, such as Barreiras and Goiânia, showed underestimation. Monthly cycling was also analyzed, highlighting seasonality, with greater amplitude in Santa Maria and lower in Caicó. In some locations, such as Campo Grande, the influence of aerosols is more significant, especially during the dry months, when forest fires, mainly in the Amazon region, increase the aerosol optical depth. The results show that reanalysis estimates can be used to evaluate the temporal variability of solar irradiation in regions without observational data. In conclusion, the study was able to evaluate the temporal variability of solar irradiation in Brazil using MERRA-2 atmospheric reanalysis data, demonstrating that, although there are differences with observational data, reanalysis estimates are useful in areas without observed data, with values correlation values above 0.8 and reaching values close to 0.95. However, although small, the differences observed between measured and estimated solar irradiation are generally caused by the inability of models to adequately represent the fraction of clouds and aerosols in the atmosphere.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call