Abstract
In the allocation of resources toward public infrastructure, spending on maintenance is typically neglected. Using a heterogeneous agent model, we find that reallocating funding away from new infrastructure investment and toward maintenance raises the effectiveness of existing public infrastructure and thus yields gains in GDP and in aggregate welfare. Richer households experience larger welfare gains than poorer households. A reallocation that takes funding away from maintenance is found to have adverse effects on GDP and aggregate welfare. Raising new funding with taxation yields larger positive benefits if this additional spending is divided between maintenance expenditures and investment in new infrastructure. Giving in to the “Tyranny of the Ribbon” by policymakers, that is, raising new funding to be spent only on new infrastructure, is shown to be the worse option.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.