Abstract

Since the founding of the People’s Republic of China, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China has continuously improved and developed the rural system, deepened rural reform, and promoted the process of agricultural and rural modernization. This paper constructs an analytical framework of rural revitalization and explores the logical law behind it from the three aspects of theoretical evolution, historical evolution, and realistic development. Then, on the basis of summarizing the existing rural revitalization path model, in view of the lack of industrial, ecological, cultural, and other rural revitalization path development models, the paper explores the general principles of rural revitalization path selection and puts forward a realistic choice: First, the key breakthrough of rural revitalization will be achieved through the construction of a rural revitalization planning system, land system reform, and green development. Second, the connotation and extension of concepts, such as “small farmers”, “industry prosperity”, and “rural areas”, are objectively analyzed and evaluated, so as to promote rural revitalization and avoid the risks and challenges that it may face in practice.

Highlights

  • The issue of “three rural” has always been a top priority of the work of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the state

  • The total agricultural output value in 2018 (647.3 billion yuan) was 238.2 times that of the early days of the founding (27.18 billion yuan), and the Engel coefficient of rural residents fell from more than 70% at that time to 30.1%

  • The beautiful countryside, precision poverty alleviation, two mountains theory, three musts, three cannots, three unshakeables, and three rural series were put forward as new ideas, new opinions, and new requirements, which are the crystallization of the collective wisdom of the Central Committee with Comrade Xi as the core, laying an ideological foundation and providing a theoretical guarantee for the implementation of the rural revitalization strategy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The issue of “three rural” (i.e., the issue of “three rural” refers to the problems of the continuous modernization of Chinese cities, the continuous development of secondary and tertiary industries, and the continuous improvement of urban residents, while the progress of rural areas, the development of agriculture, and the well-being of farmers are relatively lagging behind) has always been a top priority of the work of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the state. By the end of 2004, the realization of well-off rural areas in the country was only at 21.6%, and the imbalance in the development of the rural economy, politics, and culture became increasingly prominent To this end, the Fifth Plenary Session of the 16th Central Committee put forward general requirements for building a new socialist countryside, including production and development, well-off life, rural civilization, clean village appearance, and democratic management, on the basis of economic, political, cultural, and sustainable development. Rural infrastructure and people’s livelihood systems gradually improved, and the number of insured rural persons reached 320 million (the date comes from the China Agricultural Yearbook (2013)) This was another “golden period” for rural development, but the deep-seated problems remained; for instance, the trend of a widening income gap between urban and rural areas did not fundamentally change: The income gap between urban and rural residents in 2005–2012 was above. 3.10:1, and even in some years reached 3.33:1

The Triple Logic of Rural Revitalization
The Theoretical Evolution Logic of Rural Revitalization
The Basic Marxist Point of View
Enriching and Developing the Rural Thought of the Communist Party of China
The Logic of the Historical Evolution of Rural Revitalization
Conform to the Law of World Economic Development
The Historical Continuation of Centuries-Old Rural Practice
The Historical Mission of China’s Economic Development
The of rural
The Realistic Need for Rural Revitalization
The Model Exploration Stage of Rural Revitalization
Summary of Existing Patterns
Insufficient in Existing Mode
General Principles of Selecting a Rural Revitalization Path
The Realistic Choice of the Path of Rural Revitalization
Key Breakthrough Scored in Rural Revitalization
Avoid Potential Cognitive and Practical Risks
Findings
Conclusions and Future

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.