Abstract

Pandemic-forced remote teaching has highlighted the relevance of redesigning planification in order to transform face-to-face into online courses in higher education. Indeed, the type of e-learning activities, e-assessment and development of student-centred active learning tasks remains a challenge. In this work we investigated the academic performance of an online learning environment in a course with high number of enrolled students carried out in the pandemic context in 2020 and compared it to the 2019 face-to-face version of the course. The e-learning version of the course included some changes regarding the face-to-face to allow active student learning, digital learning environment, knowledge enforcement, and further exploitation of the available activities in the Moodle platform as for the face-to-face course, although the syllabus remained unchanged. This study finds both synchronous and asynchronous problem-solving based e-learning together with self-assessment and team-based continuous and individual questionnaire assessments to be valuable instructional methods that allowed higher student academic performance in comparison to the face-to-face academic student results. Furthermore, the academic performance was directly related to the student participation in both team-based and individual activities during the course, demonstrating that the adaptation of the face-to-face course to the e-learning environment was, at least, as efficient as the traditional course, despite student resistance to e-learning and e-assessment.

Highlights

  • Pandemic-forced remote teaching has highlighted the relevance of redesigning planification in order to transform face-to-face into online courses in higher education

  • We present a retrospective analysis of two versions of the same course in higher education with the same syllabus: a face-to-face and an online course with an elearning environment (e-learning)

  • Only 35% of students participating in the face-to-face course, while 42% of the students who participated in the online course with an e-learning environment, were exempt from the exam (Figure 1B and Table 2), indicating an increase in the academic performance of the students after carrying out the online course with respect with the face-to-face course

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pandemic-forced remote teaching has highlighted the relevance of redesigning planification in order to transform face-to-face into online courses in higher education. In the context of this forced remote teaching, the relevance of redesigning planification in order to transform face-to-face into online courses, including the type of learning activities and assessment, remains a challenge, especially in relatively small nations (Wang, 2009) such as Uruguay. The minimum criteria or expectations that must be considered in higher education in order to transform face-to-face courses into online or e-learning environments include focusing on online capabilities developed by both students and teachers, considering the intentional integration of technology to support teaching and learning processes, and emphasizing active learning (learner-centred) and/or problem solvingbased approaches (Barkley, 2010; Barkley et al, 2005; Ferrufino Olmos, 2021). The emergency-driven compulsory remote teaching has imposed teachers to attend all these criteria from different points of view and make teaching strategies more flexible and diverse, while considering different student learning abilities in order to successfully incorporate e-learning in higher education courses

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call