Abstract

Simple SummaryComparative studies of primate gustatory anatomy are sparse and incomplete. Here, we compare both the macro and micro anatomy of the tongue in three lemurid species. We included two non-destructive nectar-feeders, Varecia variegata and Eulemur macaco, and one destructive flower feeder, Lemur catta. To study the tongue’s structure, we used direct observation together with different microscopy techniques, ranging from optical microscopy to electronic microscopy. We found differences in the size, shape, and distribution of the tongue’s papillae. Most notably, there are large distinct papillae present at the tip of the tongue in nectar-feeding species. In addition, histological images of the ventro-apical portion of the tongue show that tongue houses an encapsulated structure in all species studied. The non-destructive flower-feeding species share similar tongue and sublingua anatomy, suggesting that the observed features may be adaptive for flower feeding. These features were not observed in the destructive flower feeder, Lemur catta.The mobility of the primate tongue allows for the manipulation of food, but, in addition, houses both general sensory afferents and special sensory end organs. Taste buds can be found across the tongue, but the ones found within the fungiform papillae on the anterior two thirds of the tongue are the first gustatory structures to come into contact with food, and are critical in making food ingestion decisions. Comparative studies of both the macro and micro anatomy in primates are sparse and incomplete, yet there is evidence that gustatory adaptation exists in several primate taxa. One is the distally feathered tongues observed in non-destructive nectar feeders, such as Eulemur rubriventer. We compare both the macro and micro anatomy of three lemurid species who died of natural causes in captivity. We included the following two non-destructive nectar feeders: Varecia variegata and Eulemur macaco, and the following destructive flower feeder: Lemur catta. Strepsirrhines and tarsiers are unique among primates, because they possess a sublingua, which is an anatomical structure that is located below the tongue. We include a microanatomical description of both the tongue and sublingua, which were accomplished using hematoxylin–eosin and Masson trichrome stains, and scanning electron microscopy. We found differences in the size, shape, and distribution of fungiform papillae, and differences in the morphology of conical papillae surrounding the circumvallate ones in all three species. Most notably, large distinct papillae were present at the tip of the tongue in nectar-feeding species. In addition, histological images of the ventro-apical portion of the tongue displayed that it houses an encapsulated structure, but only in Lemur catta case such structure presents cartilage inside. The presence of an encapsulated structure, coupled with the shared morphological traits associated with the sublingua and the tongue tip in Varecia variegata and Eulemur macaco, point to possible feeding adaptations that facilitate non-destructive flower feeding in these two lemurids.

Highlights

  • Among prosimian primates, variation in tongue morphology has been linked to dietary adaptations, most notably, nectar feeding [14,28]

  • The lateral borders are parallel in Lemur catta, but slightly convergent in the forward direction in Varecia variegata and Eulemur macaco

  • In Lemur catta, the sublingua is triangular in shape and ends in a single tip; while several tips were observed in Varecia variegata

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coevolution has produced a codependency between primates and plants [1,2,3,4]. Primate nectar feeding and the cross-pollination of flowers is well acknowledged today [5,6,7,8]. The best evidence for non-destructive flower feeding exists among the Malagasy strepsirrhines. Nectar appears to be the second most important food item in the annual diets of most Malagasy strepsirrhines [9], and can sustain a medium-sized primate by providing them with protein, sugars, and essential amino acids [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Eulemur mongoz mongoz has been observed to spend 80% of its foraging time feeding from the nectar-producing parts of four species of plants [5,18,23]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call