The Tiebout Model: Bring Back the Entrepreneurs

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Tiebout Model: Bring Back the EntrepreneursJ. Vernon HendersonJ. Vernon Henderson Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 93, Number 2Apr., 1985 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/261298 Views: 26Total views on this site Citations: 114Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1985 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Richard W. Tresch Optimal Federalism, (Jan 2023): 481–499.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822864-7.00027-0Matthew Wilson Government market power and public goods provision in a federation, International Tax and Public Finance 28, no.11 (Jun 2020): 68–89.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-020-09614-5Marc H. Vatter Stratified zoning in central cities, Journal of Housing Economics 50 (Dec 2020): 101716.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2020.101716Levon Barseghyan, Stephen Coate Community Development by Public Wealth Accumulation, Journal of Urban Economics (Nov 2020): 103297.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2020.103297Frankie J. Weinberg How and When Is Role Modeling Effective? The Influence of Mentee Professional Identity on Mentoring Dynamics and Personal Learning Outcomes, Group & Organization Management 44, no.22 (Apr 2019): 425–477.https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601119838689Kangoh Lee Absentee ownership, land taxation and surcharge, The Annals of Regional Science 62, no.11 (Oct 2018): 47–68.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-018-0880-7Ivan Jankovic 1776 Strikes Back—Anti-federalist Critics of the Constitution, (Dec 2018): 167–193.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03733-8_7Tidiane Ly Sub-metropolitan tax competition with household and capital mobility, International Tax and Public Finance 25, no.55 (Apr 2018): 1129–1169.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-018-9490-7Christophe Feder Decentralization and spillovers: A new role for transportation infrastructure, Economics of Transportation 13 (Mar 2018): 36–47.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2017.09.002Dennis Epple Tiebout Hypothesis, (Feb 2018): 13641–13645.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1372Sunhyung Lee Differential Effects of Fiscal Decentralization: Local Revenue Share vs. Local Fiscal Autonomy, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205509Perry Burnett OVERPOPULATION, OPTIMAL CITY SIZE AND THE EFFICIENCY OF URBAN SPRAWL, Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies 28, no.33 (Apr 2016): 143–161.https://doi.org/10.1111/rurd.12051Andrew C. Barr and Thomas S. Dee PROPERTY TAXES AND POLITICIANS: EVIDENCE FROM SCHOOL BUDGET ELECTIONS, National Tax Journal 69, no.33 (Mar 2021): 517–544.https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2016.3.02Tidiane Ly Sub-Metropolitan Tax Competition with Household and Capital Mobility, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2815823Agustin Leon-Moreta Municipal Incorporation: Socioeconomic and Policy Factors of Influence, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2948750Agustin Leon-Moreta Municipal incorporation in the United States, Urban Studies 52, no.1616 (Oct 2014): 3160–3180.https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014556588Agustin Leon-Moreta Municipal Incorporation, State and Local Government Review 47, no.44 (Jan 2016): 255–270.https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X15624129Agustín León-Moreta Local Government: Municipal Incorporations, (Jul 2016): 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1081/E-EPAP3-120053287David R. Agrawal, William F. Fox, Joel Slemrod Competition and Subnational Governments: Tax Competition, Competition in Urban Areas, and Education Competition, National Tax Journal 68, no.3S3S (Jul 2015): 701–734.https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.3S.01Richard W. Tresch Optimal Federalism, (Jan 2015): 447–465.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-415834-4.00027-3Marius Brülhart, Sam Bucovetsky, Kurt Schmidheiny Taxes in Cities, (Jan 2015): 1123–1196.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59531-7.00017-XSiqi Zheng, Weizeng Sun, Rui Wang LAND SUPPLY AND CAPITALIZATION OF PUBLIC GOODS IN HOUSING PRICES: EVIDENCE FROM BEIJING, Journal of Regional Science 54, no.44 (Dec 2013): 550–568.https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12095Cameron Gordon Scale, Scope, Efficiency and Equity in Public Service Provision: How Might We Analyse the 1898 Consolidation of New York City?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2388550David R. Agrawal, William F. Fox, Joel B. Slemrod Competition and Subnational Governments: Tax Competition, Competition in Urban Areas, and Education Competition, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2515584Agustin Leon-Moreta Municipal Incorporations, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3124528Erik Johnson, Randall Walsh The effect of property taxes on vacation home growth rates: Evidence from Michigan, Regional Science and Urban Economics 43, no.55 (Sep 2013): 740–750.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.06.001Cameron Gordon An Economic Theory Perspective on Optimal Design of Government of Regional Infrastructure in Australia: The Case of National Transport, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2389209Jyh-Fa Tsai, Fu-Chuan Lai Urban Configurations with Suburban Employment by a Monopoly Vendor, International Regional Science Review 35, no.44 (Oct 2012): 424–441.https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017611415267David Stadelmann, Steve Billon Capitalisation of Fiscal Variables and Land Scarcity, Urban Studies 49, no.77 (Aug 2011): 1571–1594.https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011415433Roger D. Congleton Why local governments do not maximize profits: on the value added by the representative institutions of town and city governance, Public Choice 149, no.1-21-2 (Jul 2011): 187–207.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9835-6Roger D. Congleton Why Local Governments Do Not Maximize Profits: On the Value Added by the Representative Institutions of Town and City Governance, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1764266Steven Deller, Craig Maher Government, Effectiveness, Performance, and Local Property Values, International Journal of Public Administration 32, no.1313 (Nov 2009): 1182–1212.https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690903267091Ryo Itoh Dynamic control of rural–urban migration, Journal of Urban Economics 66, no.33 (Nov 2009): 196–202.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.07.001Tracy M. Gordon Bargaining in the shadow of the ballot box: causes and consequences of local voter initiatives, Public Choice 141, no.1-21-2 (Apr 2009): 31–48.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9434-ySteven Heubeck Competitive sprawl, Economic Theory 39, no.33 (Feb 2008): 443–460.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-008-0341-0Per Pettersson-Lidbom Do Parties Matter for Economic Outcomes? A Regression-Discontinuity Approach, Journal of the European Economic Association 6, no.55 (Sep 2008): 1037–1056.https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.5.1037Dennis Epple Tiebout Hypothesis, (Mar 2017): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1372-2Stacy Sirmans, Dean Gatzlaff, David Macpherson The History of Property Tax Capitalizationin Real Estate, Journal of Real Estate Literature 16, no.33 (Jun 2020): 327–344.https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2008.12090233Marc H. Vatter The Cause and Effect of Exclusionary Zoning in Central Cities, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.636962Paul Thorsnes, John W. Reifel TIEBOUT DYNAMICS: NEIGHBORHOOD RESPONSE TO A CENTRAL-CITY/SUBURBAN HOUSE-PRICE DIFFERENTIAL, Journal of Regional Science 47, no.44 (Oct 2007): 693–719.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2007.00526.xSTEVEN HEUBECK Preemptive Competition in City Development, Journal of Public Economic Theory 9, no.44 (Aug 2007): 641–651.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2007.00323.xPartha Gangopadhyay, Shyam Nath Globalization, Sub-national Governments and Urban Crises in the Developing World, (Jan 2006): 68–86.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502567_5Per Pettersson-Lidbom Do Parties Matter for Economic Outcomes? A Regression-Discontinuity Approach, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.988343William A. Fischel Politics In A Dynamic View Of Land-Use Regulations: Of Interest Groups And Homevoters, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 31, no.44 (Sep 2005): 397–403.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-005-3289-xErik T. Verhoef, Peter Nijkamp Spatial Externalities and the Urban Economy, (Mar 2015): 88–120.https://doi.org/10.1108/S0573-8555(2005)0000266005Richard Arnott Does the Henry George Theorem Provide a Practical Guide to Optimal City Size?, American Journal of Economics and Sociology 63, no.55 (Nov 2004): 1057–1090.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2004.00334.xRichard C. Box, Juliet Ann Musso Experiments with Local Federalism, The American Review of Public Administration 34, no.33 (Jul 2016): 259–276.https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074004267848Asher Vaturi, Boris A. Portnov, Moshe Schwartz Internal migration and fiscal capacity of local authorities: a case study of the greater Tel Aviv metropolitan area, 1985–97, Space and Polity 8, no.11 (Oct 2010): 61–85.https://doi.org/10.1080/13562570410001678833Erik T. Verhoef, Peter Nijkamp Spatial Externalities and the Urban Economy, (Jan 2004): 87–120.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0573-8555(04)66004-4Gilles Duranton, Diego Puga Chapter 48 Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies, (Jan 2004): 2063–2117.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80005-1Robert W. Helsley Chapter 54 Urban political economics, (Jan 2004): 2381–2421.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80011-7Dennis Epple, Thomas Nechyba Chapter 55 Fiscal decentralization, (Jan 2004): 2423–2480.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80012-9Masahisa Fujita, Jacques-François Thisse Références, (Oct 2003): 533–552.https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.masah.2003.01.0533Kangoh Lee Should land and capital be taxed at a uniform rate?, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d`Economique 36, no.22 (May 2003): 350–372.https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5982.t01-1-00004David M. Brasington Edge Versus Center: Finding Common Ground in the Capitalization Debate, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.424168Emmanuel Duguet, Megan MacGarvie How Well Do Patent Citations Measure Flows of Technology? Evidence from French Innovation Surveys, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.452000David M. Brasington Edge versus center: finding common ground in the capitalization debate, Journal of Urban Economics 52, no.33 (Nov 2002): 524–541.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00532-6Richard W. Tresch Optimal federalism, (Jan 2002): 855–891.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012699051-5.50031-5Suzanne Scotchmer Chapter 29 Local public goods and clubs, (Jan 2002): 1997–2042.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4420(02)80008-8Donald R. Haurin, Robert D. Dietz, Bruce A. Weinberg The Impact of Neighborhood Homeownership Rates: A Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2002).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.303398Ryosuke Okamoto The system of towns with spatial public goods, Regional Science and Urban Economics 30, no.66 (Dec 2000): 627–637.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(00)00047-8Yoshitsugu Kanemoto Price and quantity competition among heterogeneous suppliers with two-part pricing: applications to clubs, local public goods, networks, and growth controls, Regional Science and Urban Economics 30, no.66 (Dec 2000): 587–608.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(00)00054-5Yorgos Y Papageorgiou, David Pines Externalities, Indivisibility, Nonreplicability, and Agglomeration, Journal of Urban Economics 48, no.33 (Nov 2000): 509–535.https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.2000.2178Joachim Henkel, Konrad Stahl, Uwe Walz Coalition Building in a Spatial Economy, Journal of Urban Economics 47, no.11 (Jan 2000): 136–163.https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1999.2139Komei Sasaki Local public goods and their capital-gain effects, Regional Science and Urban Economics 30, no.11 (Jan 2000): 45–57.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(99)00031-9William A. Fischel Municipal Corporations, Homeowners, and the Benefit View of the Property Tax, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2000).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.233210C. Tsuriel Somerville The Industrial Organization of Housing Supply: Market Activity, Land Supply and the Size of Homebuilder Firms, Real Estate Economics 27, no.44 (Dec 1999): 669–694.https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00788William H. Hoyt Leviathan, local government expenditures, and capitalization, Regional Science and Urban Economics 29, no.22 (Mar 1999): 155–171.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(98)00027-1Joseph Gyourko, Matthew Kahn, Joseph Tracy Chapter 37 Quality of life and environmental comparisons, (Jan 1999): 1413–1454.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(99)80006-6Stephen Ross, John Yinger Chapter 47 Sorting and voting: A review of the literature on urban public finance, (Jan 1999): 2001–2060.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(99)80016-9Darin Wohlgemuth, Maureen Kilkenny Firm Relocation Threats and Copy Cat Costs, International Regional Science Review 21, no.22 (Jul 2016): 139–162.https://doi.org/10.1177/016001769802100203Ronald C. Fisher, Robert W. Wassmer Economic Influences on the Structure of Local Government in U.S. Metropolitan Areas, Journal of Urban Economics 43, no.33 (May 1998): 444–471.https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1997.2054Steven Garasky, Donald R. Haurin Tiebout Revisited: Redrawing Jurisdictional Boundaries, Journal of Urban Economics 42, no.33 (Nov 1997): 366–376.https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.2028William H Hoyt, Stuart S Rosenthal Household Location and Tiebout: Do Families Sort According to Preferences for Locational Amenities?, Journal of Urban Economics 42, no.22 (Sep 1997): 159–178.https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.2019Charles A.M de Bartolomé, Stuart S Rosenthal Opposites Attract: The Effect of the Federal Income Tax Code on Community Composition, Journal of Urban Economics 42, no.11 (Jul 1997): 18–41.https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.2012John Douglas Wilson Property taxation, congestion, and local public goods, Journal of Public Economics 64, no.22 (May 1997): 207–217.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(96)01605-2Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, Mark Rider, Mary Beth Walker Race and the Structure of School Districts in the United States, Journal of Urban Economics 41, no.22 (Mar 1997): 281–300.https://doi.org/10.1006/juec.1996.2003Vernon Henderson, Arindam Mitra The new urban landscape: Developers and edge cities, Regional Science and Urban Economics 26, no.66 (Dec 1996): 613–643.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(96)02136-9Graham Crampton Local Government Structure and Urban Residential Location, Urban Studies 33, no.77 (Aug 1996): 1061–1076.https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989650011500David E. Wildasin, John Douglas Wilson Imperfect mobility and local government behaviour in an overlapping-generations model, Journal of Public Economics 60, no.22 (May 1996): 177–198.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(95)01533-7Eric J. Heikkila Are municipalities Tieboutian clubs?, Regional Science and Urban Economics 26, no.22 (Apr 1996): 203–226.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(95)02112-4Juliet A. Musso, John M. Quigley Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in California: A Critical Evaluation, (Jan 1996): 97–123.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80266-9_7J. Vernon Henderson Will homeowners impose property taxes?, Regional Science and Urban Economics 25, no.22 (Apr 1995): 153–181.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(94)02078-URobert W. Helsley, William C. Strange City formation with commitment, Regional Science and Urban Economics 24, no.33 (Jun 1994): 373–390.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(93)02042-2J.Vernon Henderson Community choice of revenue instruments, Regional Science and Urban Economics 24, no.22 (Apr 1994): 159–183.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(93)02036-3R. Krelove The persistence and inefficiency of property tax finance of local public expenditures, Journal of Public Economics 51, no.33 (Jul 1993): 415–435.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(93)90074-4J.M. Pogodzinski, David L. Sjoquist Alternative tax regimes in a local public good economy, Journal of Public Economics 50, no.11 (Jan 1993): 115–141.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(93)90063-YSteven C. Deller, David L. Chicoine Representative Versus Direct Democracy: a Test of Allocative Efficiency in Local Government Expenditures, Public Finance Quarterly 21, no.11 (Aug 2016): 100–114.https://doi.org/10.1177/109114219302100105William H. Hoyt Market power of large cities and policy differences in metropolitan areas, Regional Science and Urban Economics 22, no.44 (Nov 1992): 539–558.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(92)90001-HThomas J. Miceli Optimal fiscal zoning when the local government is a discriminating monopolist, Regional Science and Urban Economics 22, no.44 (Nov 1992): 579–596.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(92)90003-JCharles A.M. de Bartolome The fiscal effect of community composition on public services and welfare, Journal of Urban Economics 32, no.22 (Sep 1992): 140–158.https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(92)90002-3R. Krelove Do local governments use their tax bases efficiently?, Journal of Urban Economics 31, no.33 (May 1992): 285–300.https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(92)90057-RRandall Crane On welfare measurement in cities, Journal of Urban Economics 31, no.33 (May 1992): 375–387.https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(92)90063-QWilliam H. Hoyt Competitive jurisdictions, congestion, and the Henry George Theorem, Regional Science and Urban Economics 21, no.33 (Nov 1991): 351–370.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(91)90063-SDavid Pines Tiebout without politics, Regional Science and Urban Economics 21, no.33 (Nov 1991): 469–489.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(91)90068-XCharles A.M. de Bartolome Redistributive state aid to local communities, Regional Science and Urban Economics 21, no.33 (Nov 1991): 511–528.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(91)90070-4John Douglas Wilson Urban economic theory: Land use and city size, Regional Science and Urban Economics 20, no.44 (Feb 1991): 575–582.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(91)90047-QBruce W. Hamilton Tiebout Hypothesis, (Jan 1991): 672–677.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21315-3_93Steven C. Deller An application of a test for allocative efficiency in the local public sector, Regional Science and Urban Economics 20, no.33 (Nov 1990): 395–406.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(90)90018-XCharles A. M. de Bartolome Equilibrium and Inefficiency in a Community Model With Peer Group Effects, Journal of Political Economy 98, no.11 (Oct 2015): 110–133.https://doi.org/10.1086/261671STEVEN C.DELLER Pareto-Efficiency and the Provision of Public Goods Within a Rural Setting, Growth and Change 21, no.11 (Jan 1990): 30–39.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.1990.tb00508.xDavid Pines Handbook of regional and urban economics, volume 2: Urban economics,, Regional Science and Urban Economics 19, no.44 (Dec 1989): 646–658.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(89)90025-2Dennis Epple, Thomas Romer On the flexibility of municipal boundaries, Journal of Urban Economics 26, no.33 (Nov 1989): 307–319.https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(89)90004-1Joseph Gyourko, Joseph Tracy On the political economy of land value capitalization and local public sector rent seeking in a Tiebout model, Journal of Urban Economics 26, no.22 (Sep 1989): 152–173.https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(89)90014-4Joseph Gyourko, Joseph Tracy Local public sector rent-seeking and its impact on local land values, Regional Science and Urban Economics 19, no.33 (Aug 1989): 493–516.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(89)90016-1Timothy J. Goodspeed A re-examination of the use of ability to pay taxes by local governments, Journal of Public Economics 38, no.33 (Apr 1989): 319–342.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(89)90062-5Alain Mingat, Pierre Salmon Alterable electorates in the context of residential mobility, Public Choice 59, no.11 (Oct 1988): 67–82.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119450Anwar Chaudry-Shah CAPITALIZATION AND THE THEORY OF LOCAL PUBLIC FINANCE: AN INTERPRETIVE ESSAY, Journal of Economic Surveys 2, no.33 (Sep 1988): 209–243.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.1988.tb00045.xDennis Epple, Thomas Romer, Radu Filimon Community development with endogenous land use controls, Journal of Public Economics 35, no.22 (Mar 1988): 133–162.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(88)90051-5Daniel L. Rubinfeld Chapter 11 The economics of the local public sector, (Jan 1987): 571–645.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4420(87)80006-XDavid E. Wildasin Chapter 29 Theoretical analysis of local public economics, (Jan 1987): 1131–1178.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(87)80015-9Bruce W. Hamilton Tiebout Hypothesis, (Nov 2016): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1372-1Suzanne Scotchmer Local public goods in an equilibrium, Regional Science and Urban Economics 16, no.44 (Nov 1986): 463–481.https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(86)90018-9Partha Gangopadhyay Liberalisation, democratisation and the distribution of urban local public goods, (): 57–72.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1572-8323(08)05005-4