Abstract

It is well known to all those acquainted with D. N. Uznadze's theory of set [ustanovka] (1) that this theory was meant to answer question of the character and inner structure of human activity [11; 79]. But, as A. T. Bochorishvili correctly noted, we do not yet have clarity in basic concepts. … Soviet psychology cannot yet go so far as to speak of content of basic concept of psychology of set, of content of set itself [5: 15]. As a panacea for overcoming these differences of opinion, Bochorishvili proposes that we widely and actively develop investigations of theoretical bases of psychology of set as D. N. Uznadze understood if (ibid.).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call