Abstract

It is agreed among economists that, in the absence of any policy response, an oil price shock in an oil-importing country will produce a (presumably) temporaru increase in both inflation and unemployment. Freeman, Johnson, Blinder, Branco-Sachs, Buiter, Gordon, Phelps, and others have put forth models in which such a stagflationary response results from higher oil prices. Rather than a mere happenstance, the promulgaion of these models was attributable to the macreconomic events which took place in most oil-importing countries following teh large oil prices hikes of the 1970s. Economists were quick to point out that an oil price shock presents policy makers with a choice, to wit, whether to accomadate the shocks or to keep policy constant in the face of the stagflationary response. Those who endorsed the existence of a short-run trade-off between inflation and unemployment typically favored some type of accommodation, while those who denied the existence of a stable, short-run trade-off argued against accomodation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.