Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to describe vaginal hysterectomy practice patterns as well as facilitators and inhibitors to performing vaginal hysterectomy among gynecologic surgeons. Secondary objectives were to describe facilitators and inhibitors to the teaching and training of vaginal hysterectomy. Quantitative analysis of an online survey and qualitative analyses of the one-on-one interviews on gynecologic surgeons was conducted. This study was approved by the IRB. Online survey and one-on -one virtual interviews. Members of the AAGL and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons INTERVENTIONS: None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 505 gynecologic surgeons completed the survey. Most surgeons were white (66.9%) and had a clinic in North America (67.5%). About 48% of respondents reported "no barrier" to performing vaginal hysterectomies including pathology, visualization and exposure, and performance of concomitant procedures. Higher surgical volume was the only factor most commonly rated by surgeons as enabling teaching of vaginal hysterectomy "quite a bit" (31.3%). Most surgeons agreed that vaginal hysterectomies are important to women's health (82.8%) and that all gynecologic surgeons should be able to perform vaginal hysterectomies (66.3%). In terms of medical education and training, most surgeons thought that residents should be required to achieve competency for vaginal hysterectomy prior to graduation (71.7%) and disagreed (56.0%) that we should eliminate residency graduation requirements for vaginal hysterectomy numbers. From the one-on-one interviews, major themes identified included: Advocacy, Centralizing Efforts, Compensation and Incentives, Cycle of Low Experience, Decreasing Regional Trends, Lack of Industry Support, Transvaginal versus Laparoscopy Culture, Varied Training Targets and Resources, Innovations in Training, and Self-Motivation. Vaginal hysterectomy remains important to our field. Identified barriers and major themes from this study can direct future efforts to increase its adoption.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.