Abstract

Abrasive blasting is a process widely used in dentistry. One of the uses is the development of metal surfaces for connections with ceramics in fixed prosthetic restorations. The purpose of this paper was to check how the rough surface profile (width, height, and depth on unevenness) impacts the surface’s condition, like its wettability and percentage of stuck abrasives. The Ni-Cr alloy surface was abrasive blasted by silicon carbide with the various pressure parameters (0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 MPa) and abrasive particle sizes (50, 110, and 250 µm). Cleaned surfaces were examined for roughness, wettability, and percentage of stuck abrasive particles on the surface. The surface after abrasive blasting using 110 µm of abrasive size and 0.4 MPa pressure has the best wettability results. The width of unevenness may cause it. When the unevenness has too small or too large width and depth, the fluids may not cover the entire cavities because of locking the air. The surface condition of dental alloys directly affects metal–ceramic connection strength. The knowledge about the impact of the abrasive blasting parameters on the bond strength will allow one to create durable dental restorations.

Highlights

  • Abrasive blasting, more commonly known as sandblasting, is a process of forcibly propelling the steam of abrasive material on the surface under high pressure, which results in smoothing a rough surface, roughening a smooth surface, removing surface contaminants, or shaping a surface [1].The surface’s final appearance is related to the operation of several factors that influence its condition in various ways

  • Materials with lower hardness are more susceptible to the effect of the abrasive, which is why their profile is characterized by higher roughness after the processing

  • The great differences for each particle size can be observed between the lowest pressure used

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The surface’s final appearance is related to the operation of several factors that influence its condition in various ways. The first of these is connected to the properties of the material subject to processing and, in particular, its hardness. Materials with lower hardness are more susceptible to the effect of the abrasive, which is why their profile is characterized by higher roughness after the processing. Another factor is the type of abrasive used for processing. Wet processing is less aggressive for the surface, and dusting is Materials 2020, 13, 5824; doi:10.3390/ma13245824 www.mdpi.com/journal/materials

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call