Abstract

Over the last decades, HRM scholars associated the inclusion of women into HRM with the occupation's loss of status. Such views have difficulties to explain more recent developments in Europe that show a co-evolution of feminization and status increase of HRM. In this article, we review these developments and offer an explanation that accounts for them. Linking neo-institutional arguments with literature on sex stereotypes, we suggest that allocating women to HRM offers a solution for organizations to deal with growing demands for enhancing diversity within top management without giving up the traditional division of female and male work. We show how the patterns of the inclusion of women into HRM in 11 European countries between 1995 and 2004 support this explanation. Key words: HRM, occupational status, occupational feminization, sex stereotypes, institutional pressures 'The gender composition of the board can affect the quality of (...) the financial performance of the firm. (CampbeU/Minguez-Vera 2008: 435) 'The personnel woman is a good example of the educated girl who has channelled her energies and abilities into the business community, in a job well above the rank-and-file level. (Merkel 1963: 121) Occupational feminization and status of HRM: Friends or foes? Over the last decades, there has been a remarkable increase of women working in the field of human resource management. For example, the share of female HR professionals in the US increased from 27.3 per cent in 1970 to 53.3 per cent in 1990 (Blau et al. 1998). Similar trends can be observed in other countries like the UK (Legge 1987) and Australia (Trudinger 2004). Today, in numerous industrialized countries, women represent the majority of HR professionals (Brandi et al. 2008a). Scholars examining historical developments of the HRM occupation have observed a co-evolution of changes in female representation and status of HRM: in the past, the inclusion of women in HRM has accompanied the demise of the HRM profession or hindered its ability to gain full status (Simpson/Simpson 1969). Reversely, a decrease in numbers of women has accompanied an improvement in the occupation's status. In trying to account for these developments, scholars emphasized that the representation of women within HRM depends on the attractiveness of the occupation to men (e.g., Legge 1987; Roos/Manley 1996). As long as HRM is not important at the overall level of organization and society, men are not interested and leave the positions to women. When the occupation's importance increases, men become interested in entering the field and displace women. A core argument for why women get displaced is that employers tend to prefer men for HRM when the occupation's status is high (Reskin/Roos 1990). For example, when the upcoming of scientific testing instruments shifted the image of HRM from a welfare to a professional function, the share of male HR specialists increased (Trudinger 2004: 104). A close relationship between status decrease and rise of women's representation or vice versa could be observed from the early stages of HRM until the end of the 1980s (Roos/Manley 1996). More current documentation of feminization and status of HRM cannot be found in the literature. In this article we present data filling this gap by reporting the percentage of women working in HRM (on the staff and the director level) and linking it to the status of HRM in 1995 and 2004. Using a large company level data set from 11 Western European countries we find a picture that differs considerably from the inverse relationship between female representation and status seen in the past Between 1995 and 2004 the percentage of women in HRM increased significantly and at the same time the status of HRM rose. Our data indicates the co-evolution of inclusion of women and rise of status in HRM. Arguments were used in the past to explain the inverse co-evolution, however, they have difficulties to account for co-occurrence of high occupational status and female representation. …

Highlights

  • Over the last decades, HRM scholars associated the inclusion of women into HRM with the occupation’s loss of status

  • Arguments were used in the past to explain the inverse co-evolution, they have difficulties to account for co-occurrence of high occupational status and female representation

  • We argue that decision makers urged to include women into their top management team prefer to include them in functions that fit their stereotyped characteristics relatively better than other functions. In this way allocating women to HRM is ‘the strongest link’ and offers a solution for organizations to deal with growing demands for enhancing diversity within top management without giving up the traditional division of female and male work

Read more

Summary

The continuing rise of women

The data on both feminization and status for this latest period comes from Cranet, an international research network dedicated to analyzing developments in HRM in public and private sector organizations with more than 200 employees in a national, crossnational and quasi-longitudinal way since 1989 (Brewster et al 2004). For the analysis at hand we used data from the Cranet survey rounds in 19951 and 2004 from eleven Western European countries. The mean percentage of female employees increased in all but one of the eleven countries. An average Western European HR department consists of almost three quarter women and a little more than one quarter male employees. This constitutes a significant (t (4701) = -9.78, p

Absolute Change
Switzerland UK Total
Inclusion of women and rise in status of HRM
Total women men
Sweden Switzerland UK Total
Size of company
Institutional demands for including women into top management
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.