Abstract
The focus of this paper is on temporary international administration of territory, by an international organisation or a group of states, in post-conflict situations (e.g. Kosovo [UNMIK] or Bosnia & Herzegovina, [OHR]). International territorial administrations (ITAs) can adopt decisions without engaging in significant consultations with affected individuals. For example, an administrator can adjudicate property disputes, operate/reconstruct public utilities, and dismiss people from public office. Characteristically, ITA exercise power all-encompassing and possess the ultimate authority. This exercise of public power questions the inclusion of individuals in these decision-making procedures directly affecting individuals. This paper will focus on the demand for access to justice and the creative way in which the Constitutional Court of Bosnia & Herzegovina [CCBH] has dealt with this issue.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
