Abstract

Simple SummaryThe management of house mice, Mus musculus domesticus, in low-income high-rise multi-family dwellings (MFDs) is often frustrated by the limited resources available through low-bid contracting. An improved understanding of the small-scale distribution of this important public health pest could allow the pest management industry to better allocate its limited time and resources to better managing infestations. This study utilized data from two research projects that measured house mouse infestation rates from four urban low-income MFDs to determine if a significant correlation between neighboring units exists in their infestation status. Results show that such a correlation exists whereby apartments that share a wall, ceiling or floor with a neighboring apartment that has a current infestation are more likely to have existing house mouse activity. This information can be utilized by the pest management industry to design monitoring strategies, during integrated pest management activities, to better ensure the elimination of house mice in low-income high-rise MFDs.The house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus, creates significant public health risks for residents in low-income multi-family dwellings (MFDs). This study was designed to evaluate the spatial distribution of house mice in MFDs. Four low-income high-rise apartment buildings in three cities in New Jersey were selected for building-wide monitoring on two occasions with approximately one year between the monitoring events. The presence of a house mouse infestation was determined by placing mouse bait stations with three different non-toxic baits for a one-week period in all accessible units as well as common areas. Permutation tests were conducted to evaluate house mouse infestation spatial patterns. All four analyzed buildings exhibited a significant correlation between apartments with house mouse infestations and whether they share a common wall or ceiling/floor at both sampling periods except one building during the second inspection, which contained a high number of isolated apartments. Foraging ranges, speed of locomotion, and dispersal behavior of house mice are relatively larger, faster, and more common, respectively, compared to common urban arthropod pests. This could lead to the conclusion that house mice are as likely to infest non-neighboring apartments as those that share a wall or floor/ceiling. However, these results demonstrate that house mouse infestations tend to occur among apartments that share common walls or ceilings/floors. This spatial distribution pattern can be utilized in rodent management plans to improve the efficiency of house mouse management programs in MFDs.

Highlights

  • The cosmopolitan house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus (Schwarz and Schwarz, 1943) (Rodentia: Muridae), is a prevalent urban pest [1] in low-income communities with infestation rates among several studies in multi-family dwellings (MFDs) ranging from36% to 49% [2,3,4]

  • Our research proposes that a proactive building-wide monitoring system identifies the specific locations of MFD house mouse infestations

  • While low-bid pest management contracts are typical for low-income communities, they usually do not afford the time to conduct full building inspections with every visit

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The cosmopolitan house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus (Schwarz and Schwarz, 1943) (Rodentia: Muridae), is a prevalent urban pest [1] in low-income communities with infestation rates among several studies in multi-family dwellings (MFDs) ranging from36% to 49% [2,3,4]. This prevalence puts residents in these communities at risk due to house mice being of significant public health importance [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] Their ability to live in close association with humans [1,17,18] increases that risk further. This commensal relationship among humans and house mice [19] along with the particular risk for those living in low-income communities calls for a better understanding of how house mice utilize space within a building so that the pest management industry can address infestations in a more economical manner for this subset of the population. Allee effects that prevent establishment include failure to locate mates [23], competitive feeding [24], genetic depression via inbreeding [25], and excessive depredation [26]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call