Abstract

We have extended the Rice–Tracey model (J. Mech. Phys. Solids 17 (1969) 201) of void growth to account for the void size effect based on the Taylor dislocation model, and have found that small voids tend to grow slower than large voids. For a perfectly plastic solid, the void size effect comes into play through the ratio εl/ R 0, where l is the intrinsic material length on the order of microns, ε the remote effective strain, and R 0 the void size. For micron-sized voids and small remote effective strain such that εl/ R 0⩽0.02, the void size influences the void growth rate only at high stress triaxialities. However, for sub-micron-sized voids and relatively large effective strain such that εl/ R 0>0.2, the void size has a significant effect on the void growth rate at all levels of stress triaxiality. We have also obtained the asymptotic solutions of void growth rate at high stress triaxialities accounting for the void size effect. For εl/ R 0>0.2, the void growth rate scales with the square of mean stress, rather than the exponential function in the Rice–Tracey model (1969). The void size effect in a power-law hardening solid has also been studied.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.