Abstract
AbstractThe benefits of dynamical atmosphere–ocean–wave coupling in probabilistic weather forecasts generated using convective‐scale ensemble prediction systems are to date unknown. We investigate the respective impacts of atmosphere–ocean–wave coupling, and initial condition (IC), lateral boundary condition (LBC), and stochastic physics perturbations within a convective‐scale ensemble coupled system for an extratropical cyclone case study. Towards this aim, we developed the first 18‐member, 2.2 km grid spacing ensemble regional coupled system (Ensemble‐RCS) with domain covering the British Isles and surrounding seas. Ensemble‐RCS coupled and uncoupled simulations of cyclone (February 2020) were performed. Adding stochastic perturbations to the model physics parametrizations enhances the ensemble spread of the uncoupled atmosphere‐only ensemble driven by IC and LBC perturbations, while slightly reducing (by up to 0.5 ms) the median of the ensemble 95th percentile 10‐m wind speeds from its value of about 24 ms at peak time. A substantial proportion of this impact is attributable to Charnock parameter perturbations alone. By coupling the atmosphere‐only ensemble, with stochastic physics, to the ocean, the ensemble median and spread is mainly unaffected. However, additional coupling to waves reduces the median wind speed by 1 ms, which leads to reductions of up to 70% in strong wind strike probability, and halving of the spatial coverage of high values (>50%) of this probability. Finally, we demonstrate the usefulness of two metrics originally developed for precipitation verification – the neighbourhood‐based Fraction Skill Score (FSS) and the object‐based Structure, Amplitude, Location (SAL) – for examining the spread in convective‐scale ensemble forecasts. It is concluded that coupling has a consistent impact across the ensemble members. Remarkably, the impact of coupling to waves is found to be comparable in size to that of adding IC, LBC and stochastic physics perturbations to the uncoupled atmosphere‐only ensemble simulation, implying that the dynamical coupling to ocean and sea‐state are important aspects of model uncertainty.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.