Abstract
This article discusses the degree and usefulness of the applicability of the semiotic method in science, philosophy and academic theology. The philosophy of the semiotic method and its relationship with Orthodox theology are considered. A specific case of application of the semiotic method in Russian science in the study of theological texts in the works of S.S. Averintsev is presented and studied. It is concluded that the extensional universality of the semiotic method in all spheres of knowledge and its limitations in the ability to adequately reflect reality.
Highlights
Semiotics is a relatively young science, but it already claims to be universal
Chernigovskaya once said in her lecture: “People are such creatures who like to deal with virtual reality very much, they deal with signs
Trying to trace the history of the term “semiotic method”, in Russian literature we find the work of Yu.M
Summary
Semiotics is a relatively young science, but it already claims to be universal. Relevance: A person, being in a society, at the same time is in a particular cultural environment, which is created by verbal or non-verbal language. Russian or English, as well as the style of clothing, fashion, cultural traditions, works of art — is the language, that is a set of signs that a person uses to express themselves and interacts with other people, their identification and understanding. Philosophy, science and religion use their language to describe reality. Let’s say, here is a glass of water, here it is It is already, a real glass, there is water in it. As well as not art, is language, it duplicates a real glass” [1] Why should we draw it? Where did the idea of duplicating the world come from? All art, as well as not art, is language, it duplicates a real glass” [1]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
