Abstract
The article analyzes the issues of the philosophy of non-violence, in particular, focuses on the semantic boundaries of this principle.The negative particle in the name of this position promotes a different interpretation, sometimes reducing the semantic load. Nevertheless, the principle of nonviolence is associated with such moral qualities as strength, informed choice, responsibility, which indicates the breadth of its content. The article presents thoughts about the use of force or the ability to find a compromise, discusses how to understand the position of “stick to non-violence”. In the work, the author turns both to the works of the classics of the philosophy of non-violence, Kant, Gandhi, and to modern researchers in this field
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
