Abstract
An intelligent machine will require the ability to converse on any subject: including philosophy. This paper describes how the recent discovery of the four Semantic Categories has made it possible for a machine to analysis any assertion, however convoluted, by means of Semantic Category Analysis: a procedure which provides a basis for future Man/Machine dialogue. Analytical examples discussed include the resolution of ambiguity, conundrums, paradox, and the type of assertion that ordains the improbable as the unquestionable. Philosophers make pronouncements that refer to us and our environment in the form of untestable assertions. Testable assertions are scientific, not philosophical. Semantic Category Analysis, a testable scientific procedure, detects beguiling linguistic contrivances: such as the readily persuasive `Semantic Intertwine'. Since Semantic Category Analysis can be automated, philosophical tomes can now be scanned for such contrivances. Semantic Category Analysis thus provides the basic foundations of a long overdue field of research: `The Science of Philosophy'.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
