Abstract
The purpose of this work is to study the efficacy and limitations of using standard multileaf collimators (MLCs) and micro-multileaf collimators (mMLCs) in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) by conventional and conformal radiotherapy techniques. The penumbra characteristics of MLC, mMLC, and customized block collimated beams are measured with respect to leaf edge angle, beam energy, treatment depth, and field size and compared with those generated by a commercial three-dimensional planning computer system. Upon verification of the planning system, it is used to evaluate the treatment plans generated with these beam shapers for conventional and conformal NPC treatments. The effective penumbra of a MLC beam is strongly influenced by its edge angle, leaf width, and treatment depth. The suitability of standard MLCs in conventional NPC treatments is determined mainly by the edge angle to be used. For conformal NPC treatments involving six or more fields, dose volume histograms comparable to those of customized beam blocks are obtained with a standard MLC. The mMLC does not have the same restrictions as those on standard MLC but is limited to phase II treatment by its small usable field size. Both standard MLCs and mMLCs can be used to replace customized divergent beam blocks in both conventional and conformal NPC treatments. However, a MLC, due to its larger effective penumbra, may be unsuitable for use in cases when the tumor volumes extend very close to the critical normal structures. A mMLC, on the other hand, is limited by its small maximum field size and can only be used for collimating the facial portals in the second phase treatment.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call