Abstract

Own-age bias is a well-known bias reflecting the effects of age, and its role has been demonstrated, particularly, in face recognition. However, it remains unclear whether an own-age bias exists in facial impression formation. In the present study, we used three datasets from two published and one unpublished functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study that employed the same pleasantness rating task with fMRI scanning and preferential choice task after the fMRI to investigate whether healthy young and older participants showed own-age effects in face preference. Specifically, we employed a drift-diffusion model to elaborate the existence of own-age bias in the processes of preferential choice. The behavioral results showed higher rating scores and higher drift rate for young faces than for older faces, regardless of the ages of participants. We identified a young-age effect, but not an own-age effect. Neuroimaging results from aggregation analysis of the three datasets suggest a possibility that the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) was associated with evidence accumulation of own-age faces; however, no clear evidence was provided. Importantly, we found no age-related decline in the responsiveness of the vmPFC to subjective pleasantness of faces, and both young and older participants showed a contribution of the vmPFC to the parametric representation of the subjective value of face and functional coupling between the vmPFC and ventral visual area, which reflects face preference. These results suggest that the preferential choice of face is less susceptible to the own-age bias across the lifespan of individuals.

Highlights

  • Age has a prominent effect on face perception (Korthase and Trenholme, 1982; McLellan and Mckelvie, 1993; Perrett et al, 1998; Zebrowitz et al, 2003; Rhodes, 2006)

  • We found that the drift rates for own-age faces were significantly higher than those for other-age faces in studies 1 and 2 (study 1, t(51) = –8.38, p < 0.001, d = –1.16, 95% CI [–0.37, –0.23]; study 2, t(31) = – 8.02, p < 0.001, d = –1.42, 95% CI [–0.53, –0.32]), but study 3 showed that the drift rates for other-age faces were significantly higher than those for own-age faces (t(31) = –4.76, p < 0.001, d = –0.84, 95% CI [–0.49, –0.20]) (Figure 2C)

  • Regardless of the age of the participants, the behavioral results demonstrated higher rating scores and higher drift rates for young faces than for older faces. These behavioral results showed no evidence of own-age bias in face preference, suggesting the important role of youth in face preference

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Age has a prominent effect on face perception (Korthase and Trenholme, 1982; McLellan and Mckelvie, 1993; Perrett et al, 1998; Zebrowitz et al, 2003; Rhodes, 2006). Own-Age Bias in Face Preference and remembered than other-age faces (Wright and Stroud, 2002; Anastasi and Rhodes, 2005). A seminal meta-analysis conducted by Rhodes and Anastasi (2012) showed that the recognition memory for own-age faces is better than that for other-age faces across the lifespan of individuals. These results have been explained by the increased contact hypothesis (i.e., a higher frequency of contact with own-group individuals increases the expertise of face perception) (Chiroro and Valentine, 1995) and/or socio-cognitive accounts (i.e., in-group/out-group categorization of faces results in memory bias and own-group faces are better remembered than other-group faces) (Bernstein et al, 2007). Own-age bias is considered to be rooted in the importance of or experience with one’s own age group in their daily lives, and the amount of exposure to a certain age group modulates the perceptual expertise of faces within the group (Ebner and Johnson, 2009; He et al, 2011; Macchi Cassia et al, 2012)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call