Abstract
In the last hundred years modern society went through numerous changes in life style, dietary habits, work load, physical activity and other environmental factors. As a species we are not well adapted to new de- mands. Higher levels of stress hormones provoke various effects, especially gradual change in the sensitivity of adrenergic, glucocorticoid and insulin receptors. All these changes are mutually associated and they gradually lead to metabolic syndrome, obesity, diabetes, heart failure and other types of pathology depending on genetic makeup and environmental factors. The aim of this paper is to summarize current knowledge concerning the impact of stress on cardiac function. Whereas stress response is sex specific we would emphasize a potential difference in pathophysiology of ischemic heart failure in men and women. Modern medicine has misinterpreted autonomous nervous system functions for years and this was reflected in heart failure (HF) and arterial hypertension therapy. Stress before the onset of menopause has a lesser effect on cardiac function compared to stress after menopause. Postmenopausal women have a significantly higher risk of heart disease, which is related to the diminished protection of the female hormonal cycle, but low doses of estrogen have not proven protective in postmenopausal women. Potential new targets of sex- specific cardiac therapy would come from better understanding of the molecular mechanisms exerted by nuclear receptors for steroid hormones, transcription factors involved in heart remodeling, cross-talk in adrenergic signaling pathways and their down-stream molecules.
Highlights
America’s top 15 most prescribed drugs by dispensed prescriptions published on the internet pages belong to the top six categories: pain killers, blood pressure and cholesterol lowering drugs, medication of hypothyroidism, anxiety/depression and type two diabetes
The concentrations of resting norepinephrine in their study remain stable on successive days, and were a sign of general sympathetic-nervous-system activation, while epinephrine was a marker of acute stress response [48] and variable from day to day
While increase of b2-signaling during stress response could be interpreted as protective because it was directing heart from activation of protein kinase A (PKA), Ca2+ overload and apoptosis caused by b1-adrenergic receptors (AR), on the other hand, raises insulin resistance in fat tissue, which is a bad strategy on the long term, leading to a «thrifty metabolism»
Summary
America’s top 15 most prescribed drugs by dispensed prescriptions published on the internet pages (www.forbes.com/2010/05/11/; source – IMS National Prescription Audit) belong to the top six categories: pain killers, blood pressure and cholesterol lowering drugs, medication of hypothyroidism, anxiety/depression and type two diabetes. The concentrations of resting norepinephrine in their study remain stable on successive days, and were a sign of general sympathetic-nervous-system activation, while epinephrine was a marker of acute stress response [48] and variable from day to day.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have